THE RESEARCHER DAJIONG LU SAID THAT EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION CAN BE MORE ACCURATE THAN WEATHER FORECAST IS BASED ON THREE PHYSICAL LAWS AS ITS THEORETICAL BASIS. ONE IS THE MACROSCOPIC XXXX ECHO EFFECT OF EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION. THE SECOND ONE IS THREE DIMENSIONAL XXX MODULATION EFFECT OF EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION, AND THE THIRD ONE IS THE X- INFORMATION PRINCIPLE OF EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION. IT IS CALLED THREE LAWS OF EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION FOR SHORT.
THIS IS THE SUPREME INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE FIELD OF EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION WHICH BELONGS TO DAJIONG LU ONLY. IT IS PRICELESS AND WILL NOT BE TRANSFERRED BY ANY MONEY.
《BAIDU》 STATED THAT : BECAUSE OF THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, THE INTELLECTUAL ACHIEVEMENTS OF HIGH AND NEW TECHNOLOGY HAVE BROUGHT A SERIES OF NEW OBJECTS OF PROTECTION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, SO THE TRADITIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONTENT IS ALSO EXPANDING. THIS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS JUST BELONGS TO A KIND OF NEW PROTECTION OBJECT.
BASED ON THIS KIND OF PHYSICAL THEORY OF EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION, DAJIONG LU HAS ACHIEVED ACCURATE PREDICTION FOR SOME DISTANT, NEAR AND LOCAL EARTHQUAKES 40 YEARS AGO ! IN PAST 40 YEARS NO SECOND SCIENTIST IN THE WORLD HAS BEEN ABLE TO REACH THE SAME LEVEL AS RESEARCHER DAJIONG LU DID 40 YEARS AGO !THIS JUST IS THE STRONG POWER OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS !
Research Report on the “LIGO scientists directly detecting gravitational waves” event
Is it a "gravitational wave" or "earthquake precursor wave"?
Author: Dajiong Lu
The laser interferometer is not only able to record seismic waves, but also a variety of earthquake precursors (Reference book "Impending Earthquake Prediction" by Dajiong Lu). The paper about detecting gravitational waves published in the name of "LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration" only mentioned that they considered the exclusion of seismic waves, but not whether they considered the exclusion of earthquake precursors or other sources from the Earth's interior. At least we did not see that and it is not entirely impossible ......
Accordingly, we ask whether the detected "gravitational waves" may be a kind of "earthquake precursor wave". Following this thought, we did some research.
A. Is the “Gravitational wave” detected by America’s LIGO possibly an “earthquake precursor wave”?
If the “gravitational wave” detected by America’s LIGO onSeptember 14, 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC was a kind of “earthquake precursor”, it should occur before a large earthquake. Again if the “gravitational wave” was one kind of “impending earthquake precursor”, then it should occur a few days, for example 2 or 3 days, before a large earthquake.
First, let’s search for large earthquakes over M7 around the world which occurred within half a year before October 26, 2015:
Why such a coincidence? Is this a pure coincidence or does it mean we are in the right direction? A large earthquake of M8.3 occurred in Chile which is 7,000~8,000 km away from LIGO gravitational wave detectors and just within 2~3 days after the so-called gravitational wave arrived. The “gravitational wave” event just fell within the impending quake period of the large earthquake in Chile, while other large earthquakes in the world within the same half-year period were far away from the LIGO gravitational wave detectors and were not within the 2~3 days after that event. This means that the unique Chile earthquake was the closest to the LIGO gravitational wave detectors and the “gravitational wave” was detected within 2~3 days before the earthquake in Chile, so it may be a good idea that the “gravitational wave” detected by America’s LIGO was only a kind of earthquake precursor wave!
According to our past experiments on earthquake prediction, it is not strange for detectors which are far away from the epicenter of a M8 earthquake to receive an earthquake precursor wave (electromagnetic wave) from the emitter related with the M8 earthquake. On the other hand, it is very strange that instruments with high sensitivity cannot receive any impending earthquake precursor wave from M8 earthquakes!
In conclusion, it is another possible option that the signals detected by America’s LIGO gravitational wave detectors were earthquake precursor waves.
B. About the spectrum of signals:
If someone detected a certain wave motion, then he (or she) would have described the detected signal spectrum and the response curve of the detection equipment for the fluctuation frequency, in order to determine whether the detected waveform has been distorted or not......
According to the article "human directly detected the gravitational waves for the first time” (Tencent Space Qiao Hui at 23:43 on February 11, 2016), the initial frequency of the detected gravitational wave signal was 35 Hz, then quickly it went up to 250 Hz, and finally became disorderly and then disappeared...... (the whole process lasted for only a quarter of a second. The signal detected by the detector in Livingston was 7 milliseconds earlier than the signal detected by the detector in Hanford. The time difference indicates that gravitational waves were coming from the southern sky.)
If we say that the detected signal is a kind of earthquake precursor wave, then let's take a look at the general earthquake precursor wave to see if it corresponds with the spectrum of the signal detected by the LIGO detector or not.
For earthquakes over M6.5 to M7, if using the frequency counter to measure the wave frequency of earthquakes, their spectrum should be between 40Hz and 1575Hz. We can treat the earthquake precursor as an analog of initial motion of large earthquake (no quake after being triggered), its low-end frequency of the initial motion should be the same as the low-end frequency of the earthquake, but it should be less than the high-end frequency 1575Hz of the earthquake, to be estimated as several hundred Hz. Thus the bands of earthquake precursor are in accordance with the bands of so-called "gravitational waves signal”.
Secondly, assuming that the electromagnetic radiation precursor is caused by certain kind of piezoelectric effect, then the bands of electromagnetic radiation precursors should be consistent with bands of stress precursor. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that the signal detected by the LIGO detector could possibly be a kind of earthquake precursor wave.
C. About the duration of the signal:
Why is the duration of the precursor only 0.4 seconds? That is, why only 0.4 seconds if their signals are a kind of earthquake precursor?
In the past years, the author mostly studied impending earthquake precursors, namely, precursors occurring a few days before large earthquakes.
As we all know, the crustal stress is modulated by solid tide, so the earthquake precursor occurs only when the crustal stress reaches or exceeds the precursor threshold. In other words, the impending earthquake precursor as the sudden change form occurs in the peaks or valleys of solid tide, so generally speaking, they are short-lived. (The earthquake would occur when crustal stress reaches or exceeds the threshold of the earthquake.) Due to their gravitational wave detectors is well shielded, only the strongest electromagnetic radiation emitted in the short duration (for example 0.4 seconds) in which there are largest peak or valley tidal values is able to penetrate the shield and be detected. The electromagnetic radiation outside this duration (0.4 seconds) is shielded by their instrument.
D. About the arrival time of the signal:
A typically impending earthquake precursor occurs within 2 to 3 days before the earthquake. Most of the time this will be the case! We have said in the previous section that the so-called "gravitational waves" detected by LIGO did occur within 2-3 days before the M8.3 earthquake in Chile!
E. About the angle of incidence and the signal strength:
The issue of the incident angle of "gravitational waves" did not appear to be mentioned in detail in the paper from LIGO. How about the angle between the incident angle of "gravitational waves" and the plane of the detecting equipment? It is directly related to the signal strength. Because the two perpendicular arms of their each interferometer is in free form, two signals may offset at a certain angle of incidence. Also, because the interferometer arms of the two interferometers are not parallel to each other (refer to paper screenshot), the signal strength detected by the two interferometers may have differences, or large or small......
Let's look at a passage of LIGO paper in English. It says, “Only the LIGO detectors were observing at the time of GW150914. The Virgo detector was being upgraded, and GEO 600, though not sufficiently sensitive to detect this event, was operating but not in observational mode”. “With only two detectors the source position is primarily determined by the relative arrival time and ……”
That is, the angle of incidence is anti-deducted, not by taking measurements.
Also another article which introduced LIGO’s detection says: “The positioning accuracy of gravitational wave sources can be improved only after the Australian interferometer is networked.” In other words, the positioning of the source encountered difficulties before the Australian interferometer is networked. It shows indirectly that our suspicion is reasonable.
F. Discussion of the time difference of signals detected by the two detectors:
1. The time difference between signals detected by the two LIGO detectors was about 7 milliseconds. Some people think that this can only be an error of signals made by a human. We believe that if the signal was emitted from the epicenter of the earthquake in Chile, then this 7ms may be human error and in fact the time difference should be 10 milliseconds!
2. The second possibility is that the epicenter was not necessarily the original source of the specific precursor (of course the precursor also can be emitted from the epicenter); the area of ruptured plate of a M8 earthquake may have an extension up to thousands of kilometers, and it is entirely possible that the stress point of a precursor is far away from L1, H1 and located in a different direction! It is expected that this stress point is likely to be located in a fault of the eastern Pacific. We wish to find this stress point which meets the condition with 7 ms time difference between the two detectors. To test and verify this argument, three detectors are necessary at least! This corresponds with the content discussed in Section E!
G. GRB (gamma-ray bursts) cannot explain that the signal detected by LIGO is a gravitational wave (I hope to discuss this with Professor Cai Yifu, University of Science and Technology of China.)
In the important news of the first edition, February 18, 2016 China Science News, there is a report about a response to the question of gravitational wave detection by Professor Cai Yifu, Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China.
At first Mr. Cai affirmed the issues involved in the gravitational wave detection, but he defended the result of the LIGO detection: While the merging of black holes, was emitted not only gravitational waves but also electromagnetic signals, that is, gamma-ray bursts, the relevant signals were captured and examined by other telescopes independently. This shows that the probability of a non-gravitational wave is very low.
The author believes that his explanation did not help LIGO, but gave further help to the research fellow Dajiong Lu, providing further evidence for Lu’s dissertation --- The signals detected by LIGO may be a kind of earthquake precursor!
It is almost well-known in the field of earthquake prediction that magnetic storms from the cosmos are frequently observed before the occurrence of large earthquakes. Some seismologists also use these magnetic storms to predict earthquakes! First let us quote a text passage in Prof. Zhendong Yu’s paper, "the root and causes of the M8 Wenchuan earthquake".
The environmental enhancement of cosmic rays which is symbolized by large GLE events of cosmic rays on January 20, 2005 was a major source of the Wen-chuan M8.0 earthquake. It should be noted that the enhancement of cosmic rays in large GLE events is only a symbol. We don’t say that the neutron part of enhanced cosmic rays alone can cause a major earthquake. Large earthquakes are trigged by all high-energy radiation, including known and unknown varieties of high-energy radiation, caused by corresponding solar flares of cosmic rays in the outbreak. We believe that there was an important astronomical event which was going to affect the Wen-chuan earthquake. It just is extremely important γ-ray bursts GRB080319B observed on March 19, 2008. The γ-ray bursts were 75 hundred-million light-years away from the Earth. The most surprising feature is that its optical afterglow has reached apparent magnitude 5.3. γ-ray bursts are the most violent bursts known after the Big Bang. It is generally believed that most γ-ray bursts are produced when a massive star after burning all its nuclear fuel collapses to form black holes or neutron stars. The energy released may reach up to 1054 erg / sec. The outburst process produces a variety of known and unknown flux of energetic particles, in addition to γ-rays, X-rays, visible light and radio emissions. This high-energy radiation and material arising from the γ-ray burst arrives and affects the Earth absolutely. Based on research on the relationship between supernova explosions and large earthquakes, we already know that the brightest apparent magnitude of stellar explosions is an indicator reflecting the degree of magnitude of earthquakes. A supernova explosion of the brightest apparent magnitude of 3 can just cause an earthquake of M8. The brightest apparent magnitude of γ-ray burst GRB080319B reached 5.3; their difference is 2 only, but the outbreak scope of the γ-ray bursts is a hundred million times larger than a supernova explosion, so generating high-energy radiation and material which could cause large earthquakes much greater than that generated by supernova explosion. Therefore, there is reason to believe that γ ray burst GRB080319B could affect seismic activity. That is, the combined effect of solar flares of cosmic rays reflected by the large GLE event on January 20, 2005 and γ-ray burst GRB080319B is the trigger factor of the Wen-chuan earthquake.
Thus the argument (the correlation signal, electromagnetic wave signal namely GRBs were independently captured by other telescopes and cross-checked by each other) which was said by Mr. Cai does not illustrate that a gravitational wave was detected by LIGO, and precisely it just provides other favorable evidence for the thesis of the author (the signal detected by LIGO may have been an earthquake precursor wave.) There is a close relation between earthquakes, magnetic storms, and gamma-ray bursts; and the relationship between electromagnetic wave signals (namely GRBs) and gravitational waves has never been confirmed before, because a gravitational wave has never been detected by mankind before.
Of course, the result detected by LIGO detectors perhaps will play a role in the research on the causes of earthquakes or trigger mechanism.
Conclusion: The concept of earthquake precursors may be used to explain the signal detected by the LIGO gravitational wave detectors, i.e. it is another possible option!
This article attempts to reveal a secret: Why have scientists around the world not been able to achieve impending earthquake predictions so far.
Forty years ago, Researcher Dajiong Lu predicted accurately and successfully some earthquakes, especially three elements of teleseisms. Since then until today, no scientist in the world can reach the level of earthquake prediction achieved by researcher Dajiong Lu 40 years ago!
To investigate its cause: It may be that seismologists around the world regard impending earthquake precursors as interference or noise to deal with. Coincidentally, recently astronomers around the world are likely to regard impending earthquake precursors as gravitational waves! Therefore, scientists all over the world consider that there are no trustworthy impending earthquake precursors before large earthquakes, so that they do nothing and are helpless in the field of impending earthquake prediction!
The above-mentioned serves as a reference for worldwide scientists!
At the same time, the subjective feeling of the author is that scientists around the world are avoiding research on earthquake prediction, preferring to study gravitational waves emitted 1.3 billion light-years far far away, preferring to study artificial intelligence “GO” (a game played with black and white stones on a board of 361 crosses) ......but dare not touch the impending earthquake prediction of large earthquakes!
Thanks: Japanese Dr. Dai Feng made very valuable comments, herein to express my gratitude!
British Scientist, Prof. J. Tarney, Director of Department of Geology, University of Leicester reported to the British Council that “Dr. Lu Dajiong is clearly a first-rate scientist.”
Reputedly, British Scientists are more conservative usually and rarely to appraise other country’s scientist as a first-rate scientist. Therefore, Lu was over whelmed by the document Lu received in 1981 (Lu was 41 years old), and Lu felt distressed because Lu suffered…
The Earthquake Prediction Instrument Developed by Dajiong Lu and Gao Jian Guo Had the Honor to Get a Great Science and Technology Award from the ChineseAcademy of Science
The readers, who already read the books “Impending Earthquake Prediction” and “Rose Cloud as a kind of Earthquake Precursor”, should know that Prof. Dajiong Lu successfully predicted earthquakes mainly depending on “Laser Phase-Locked Strainometer”, “Bedrock Earth-current Recorder” and “Electromagnetic Radiation Envelope Recorder”. At the same time, in order to increase successful probability of prediction, Rose Cloud as a kind of earthquake precursor and other Meteorological data was used.
Dajiong Lu expounded that Earthquake Cloud is a kind of sudden change precursor of earthquake, but it doesn’t mean that people could predict three elements of earthquake easily and accurately only using one kind of precursor ------ earthquake cloud.Dajiong Lu purported to be “Earthquake Prediction is more Accurate than Weather Forecast”, mainly means above-mentioned precursors from three instruments. Moreover, the Rose Clouds as a kind of Precursor also is an important auxiliary medium indeed.
Due to Prof. Dajiong Lu found that there was a reader (from Chinese Baibu) misunderstood earthquake cloud, so that Lu emphasizes here again. Please various large websites pay attention to the importance to use instruments to explore earthquake precursors, don’t reveal only one-legged on earthquake cloud, thereby cause reader to have an illusion.
The original type of laser phase-locked strainometer developed by Dajiong Lu and Gao Jian Guo is “Laser Phase-Locked Interferometer”. The readers, who already read “Impeding Earthquake Prediction”, perhaps noticed: In 1973 the “Laser Phase-Locked Interferometer” developed by Lu and Gao was for probing gravitational radiation which is possibly emitted from the Pulsar NP 0532 in Crab Nebula, 7000 light-year away from the earth. On July 28, 1976, the Tangshan earthquake of Ms 7.8 occurred, this instrument was converted into a strainometer suitable for recording bedrock strain. Afterward this instrument and its application in the field of earthquake prediction, especially under its operation in coordination with other instruments successfully predicting three elements of some teleseisms, had the honor to get a great science and technology achievement award from the ChineseAcademy of Sciences. At that time, Guan Wei Yan was an affair cadre of physics Institute.
Some people said houmerously: The instrument used to probe gravitational radiation emitted from the Pulsar which is 7000 light-year away from us, now we use it to probe earthquake precursors in the earth, it looks like using a knife of killing cow to kill a chicken? No wonder it could predict earthquakes which are several thousands km away from earthquake prediction station.
Lu Dajiong had predicted successfully the earthquake in America to Prof. Qiang Zuji etc.,China State Seismological Bureau
From April 3-9th, 1978, Lu attended the Achievements Exchange Meeting on Earthquake and Geology in Tongxian County, Beijing. In the small hours of April 8, Lu found that earthquake clouds had appeared in the northeast. After taking into account the periodic sudden changes of wind velocity in the past few days, Lu predicted to Prof.Qiang Zuji and Mr. Zhang Decheng of the Office of Analysis and Prediction of the State Seismological Bureau, and Mr. Fu Muxing of the Earthquake Publishing House andanother colleague, that there could be an earthquake of magnitude 7 or so near the Aleutian Islands in the northern Pacific on April 12, 1978.
An earthquake of 7.0 occurred in Alaska, east of the Aleutians, on April 12. Prof. Qiang Zuji asked Mr.Zhang Decheng wrote an certificate to Lu, it indicated Lu made asuccessfulprediction at that time.
Someone required Lu makes a miraculous forecast according to earthquake cloud. It means, otherwise Lu is a …. In fact, Lu already answered this question many times: “It’s just necessary to obtain a valuable forecast only when co-operating to various meanspeople use earthquake cloud to predict earthquakes. Above-mentioned just is a typical example.
Regarding whether it is “miraculous”, it’ll depend on your personal understanding. As Lu’s idea, this prediction is miraculous than that famous tactician Mr.Zhu Geliang forecast the east wind for fighting. He took advantage of east wind only due to he forecast the change of local wind direction, but Lu predicted strong earthquake which occurred 6000 km far from the station. (if Lu would have other meteorological information and satellite information at that time, it may be more accurate to predict the epicenter).
Please report to Prof. Qiang Zuji, Zhang Decheng and Fu Muxing to verify this forecast, thank you!
Administration Burean of the Headquarters of the General Staff of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army had supported Dajiong Lu’s Research on Earthquake Prediction
After Tang-Shan Earthquake,the Shock Prevention Office under the headquarters of the General Staff heard that Dajiong Lu’s research on earthquake prediction is getting a great achievement and established contact with Lu actively and help him to solve some difficulties. At that time, it was not easy to make a phone call from Miyun Reservior to Beijing. Lu’s earthquake prediction cannot be announced promptly. Therefore the Administration Bureau help Lu set up a military phone line. So that Lu was easy to announce his earthquake prediction to the Shock Prevention Office timely. Secondly, people on duty was lacking at the Miyun Reservior Station. Then the Administration Bureau sent two soldiers to be on duty. Thus, Lu’s research on earthquake prediction at Miyun Reservior was proceeding swimmingly.
One day, the Affairs department of Physics Institute of the ChineseAcademy of Sciences held a hearing meeting for earthquake prediction research.Zhang Chun-buo, staff officer, told Guan Wei-yan, the leading cadre for affairs that:”Dajiong Lu’s earthquake prediction is a good one. The Physics Institute should give Lu a support”.
Thereafter, when Lu predicted successfully three elements of teleseism occurred in Ogasawara isles of Japan, it is a first time in the world, the Administration Bureau of the Headquarters of the General Staff wrote a certificate letter with official stamp to the Physics Institute to express thanks. Consequently, it could not be separated between the earthquake prediction achievements obtained by Dajiong Lu and the support with great exertion given by the Headquarters of the General staff.
Prof.Wu Youxun, famous scientist in the universe, paid attention and support to Dajiong Lu’s research on earthquake prediction
One day after Tang Shan earthquake, Dajiong Lu got notice suddenly that Prof. Wu youxun, the vice-president of the ChineseAcademy of Sciences wanted to comprehend Dajiong Lu’s research on earthquake prediction. Due to Dajiong Lu had known the Compton-Wu Youxun Effect in the Physics Textbook. Therefore Lu felt very excited about it.
The collective report was held in the evening at Wu’s hous. Lu introduced his research work on earthquake prediction entirely and detaily. It lasted for two hours. For the duration Wu asked some questions too. After that Wu said:’I understood it now.” And he made a phone call ask a car from Academy of Sciences for that the next morninghe will go to the ChineseAcademy of Sciences.
Few days later, Prof. Wu told Lu that:”I already told them, but they said: ”You are physicist, not seismologist, why you are favor to this young people?” (at that time Dajiong Lu was only 36 years old.) Then Prof. Wu continued his talking: “It is necessary for earthquake prediction that various academic subjects combine to storm fortifications. You are working from a point of view of physics, just like what you said, it belonged to the phenomenological physics for earthquake prediction. Consequently, I have the right to speak.” At last Wu said: “I’ll support your research work for earthquake prediction and admire your achieved success.”
Now thirty years passed already, Prof. Dajiong Lu felt China needs more scientists like Prof. Wu Youxun: Not only he got outstanding success for himself but also he’ll support for the young generation and feel happy with their achievements.
Prof. Yan Jici, the Scientist Tycoon in China, Supported Dajiong Lu’s Importment Thesis and Importment Law of Nature to Publish on the Magazine “Science China”
In 1980 Dajiong Lu had an important thesis about earthquake Prediction “Stress Wave, Motion of Strain Wave and Slow Earthquake”.Lu submitted it to the most authoritative magazine “Science China” in China. This thesis published right away due to it had been supported by Prof. Yan Jici, the Science Tycoon, the Chief Editor of magazine. This important law of nature called Lu’s Law in short discovered and summarized by Lu was expounded especially. It solved the crucial problems confused for many years in the scope of earthquake prediction.
Afterward some people couldn’t understand the thesis’s significance, they express opinion to Prof. Yan. Then Prof. Yan, the chief editor, said: “It’s good thing, please write out your different idea and I will publish your thesis and Lu’s replying thesis together, but don’t play game under table.” Thisattitude taken by the Science Tycoon was serious, conscientious and responsible one seeking truth from facts for sciences.
Above-mentioned fact was provided by Liu Yanming, the senior editor in “Science China” magazine. I appreciated him very much.
Prof. Lu Jiaxi, the President of the ChineseAcademy of Sciences supported Dajiong Lu’s research on Frontier Science
The twelveth day after Tang Shan earthquake, Dajiong Lu started to research earthquake prediction. Lu created a new academic subject “Phenomenological Physics for earthquake prediction” by himself. As a matter of fact, this subject belongs to the Frontier Science. As everyone knows, it’s difficult to develop the Frontier Science. It is one of major cause for the most of science research department to think that these frontier sciences are not belong to their scope of research. Under that, these subject wouldn’t be arranged in any plan and any international academic exchanges wouldn’t be taken on the plea that they don’t understand these subjects, and nobody identified achievements in the field of Frontier Sciences… Anyhow a serious of problems couldn’t be solved.
At this crucial moment, Dajiong Lu encounted Prof. Lu Jiaxi, newly named president of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, who is not only nice and honest but also adhering to principles. He came forward to solve lots of problems and to help develop this new academic subject. For example, President Lu notice the Physics Institute that the Institute only needs to do political qualification for Dajiong Lu goes abroad to carry out academic exchange, President Lu would sign by himself for approval. Also President Lu agreed to establish the Applied Physics and Seismology Lab. Within the ChineseAcademy of Sciences. and appointed Dajiong Lu as director. Prof. Wang Daheng, the Chief of the Technology and Science Department, came forward to collect recommendation letters from Prof. Zhang Wenyou, Prof. Cheng Yuqi and other three scientists (they are all Academician of the ChineseAcademy of Sciences) and submitted to President Lu jiaxi, so that Dajiong Lu was approved as an associate research fellow…
At the same time, a lot of highly evaluation from overseas…
So it can be said if President Lu and Chief Wang didn’t support Dajiong Lu, he would accomplish nothing.
That’s why if the Frontier Sciences could obtain strong support from intellective and provident scientists like President Lu and Chief Wang, they would have a rising and flourishing development.
Prof. Zhang Wenyou, the Chief of Geology Department of the ChineseAcademy of Sciences, the Director of the Geology Institute Provided Powerful Evidence for Predicting Epicenter through Observing Figures by Dajiong Lu
In the early period of research on earthquake prediction, Dajiong Lu found out some symptoms: observing figures recorded could predict the epicenter. Then Lu went to consult Prof. Zhang Wenyou, the Director of Geology Institute. Prof. Zhang said: “It’s reasonable. Long ago, there was an overseas seismologist. He only needed to look at the pattern of an earthquake wave recorded, he could judge directly where an earthquake already happened, didn’t need any calculation according to earthquake waveform. Therefore, it should be feasible from logic that according to waveform of earthquake precursor you could judge directly where an earthquake would happen.” Thereafter, Dajiong Lu made a lot of efforts to research and summarize, then obtained the concept of precursor mode for predicting epicenter and according to recorded waveform of earthquake precursor predicted epicenters of some strong earthquakes successfully.
After Dajiong Lu successfully predicted three elements (epicenter, magnitude and occurrence time) of Ogasawara Isles Earthquake and the Shock Prevention Office under the headquarters of the General Staff issued a certificate of successfully predicting this earthquake, Prof. Zhang said excitedly: “Please give me a copy of this certificate, I’ll show it to the Chinese Academy of Sciences and State Seismological Bureau!!!”
Actually, on the basis of Dajiong Lu’s research, the precursor mode of earthquake has even more important and profound meaning and subtle function. If a new book could be published by any chance in the near future, Prof. Dajiong Lu would write this subject and a lot of knowledge, what Lu has learned but others haven’t yet, into his book.
Japanese Prof. Hideo Toriyama admired Prof. Dajiong Lu’s book “Impending Earthquake Prediction” as a classic writing
Japanse Prof. Hideo Toriyama was very fond of Dajiong Lu’s book “Impending Earthquake Prediction” and gained its copy in Chinese in 1986, but it’s difficult for him to read it in Chinese.
After Lu published his book in English version in 1988, Prof. Hideo Toriyama expressed to Lu that: However he want to get it in English version. After he read the book sent by Lu, Prof. Hideo Toriyama admired Lu’s book “Impending Earthquake Prediction” as a classic writing in the field of Earthquake Prediction.